Linggo, Agosto 9, 2015

Lesson 7: Evaluation of Technology Learning

CONTENT

Changes in learning styles demand changes in learning experiences, and changes in learning experiences mandate changes in assessment methods. The concept of change is positively viewed as a steppingstone towards development with no exemption to the broad field of education. 19th century learners are quite different to that of the 21st century. It is quite irrational to apply an old assessment method to a new variety or set of learners. Educational developers are comprehensively building up the requisites of technology-assisted education, and they have now classified the various fluencies that are popularly seen in the new-generation learners which were identified in the previous section (solution fluency, information fluency, collaboration fluency, media fluency, creativity fluency and digital ethics).

There is a clear emphasis on the revision of some outdated assessment methods. The act of assessment should considerably meet the abovementioned competencies in order to come up with a valid result of evaluation. There would be no justification of learning outcomes if teachers would stick to the old ways of assessing learning despite of being fully aware of the fast-changing demands of the modern learners. If educators would neglect the adaption of new assessment methods, learning would lose its tract and the learners’ development would become undeterminable.

An effective way of teaching 21st century learners includes problem-solving. Through this, high-order thinking skills will be cultivated and metacognition will be put to practice. Sited in this section are the 4 D’s (define, design, do, debrief) which can be applied to strategic learning and instruction-development activities.

Define – define the problem. “What is the issue here? What do I need to know?” Keen observation helps one to notice the occurrences of certain problems in the immediate surrounding which will later become the subject of study.

Design – plan out the steps to be followed. Distribution of task assignments should be encouraged, and everyone should know who is good at taking the lead for every proposed charges. The possible outcome should be assumed and weighed “Would this hit the targets? Would this aim the planned objectives?”

Do – it doesn’t just stop on planning out, does it? Plans should be implemented and assignments should be satisfied!

Debrief – after the plans are implemented, determine if the targets have been satisfied. Things that have successfully worked out should be acknowledged and things that haven’t worked out should be identified. What things still need to be improved? When results have been branded, it would be best to pursue revision for further improvement.

In the past, only businessmen and military personnel could enjoy computer services. However, due to the increasing availability of technological tools in the public market, ordinary people can now use computers thus obtaining the privilege to engage in business (for example) without having the official “brand” of a businessman. For another instance, even a high school student can now become a journalist through just feely posting news on-line. Professional roles are now shared with the masses, and this phenomenon is called mass amateurization.

EXPERIENCE

I had my first encounter with Mr. Microsoft PowerPoint when I was in fourth year high school. I was really amazed with how the software works – the transitions, the visual and sound effects – the idea. Our first practical exam with PowerPoint was to create a presentation. Regardless of the topic, our teacher checked how we combined the effects, choose the appropriate font style and size, and put persuasive soundtracks. Through that, our teacher was able to give us with corresponding points. Our teacher’s assessment method is making sense to me now as I ponder – there are really certain competencies which the paper-and-pencil test cannot cover. However, I noticed that our teacher didn’t use a rubric in rating our outputs and I wonder how he did the rating part objectively – or was it really objective? Anyways.
REFLECTION

Flexibility is an important trait of every teacher. Being flexible means to adjust and cope up with the needs of the learners, even if it would bend our traditional ways of dealing things. It is made clear to me now that assessment take in many forms – it should be proportional to the competencies being imposed. At the end of every learning activity, learners should be able to go beyond the act of theorizing – they must be able to apply what they have learned. As a teacher, I can assess the learning development of my learners through the application of appropriate assessment methods – performance-based (for the application of scientific concepts in actual events), project-based (for the application of collaborative learning, analysis and creativity), product-based (in determining students’ degree of understanding on the presented concepts) and many more.

APPLICATION

Having made aware with the fluencies of the new-generation learners, as a future teacher, it is my responsibility to meet the learning needs of my future students. Correspondingly, the determination of these learning needs requires a rigid set of appropriate assessment methods. Through the application of a suitable assessment strategy, I’ll be able to identify the particular strengths and weaknesses of my students. The identification of students’ position in terms of learning will enable me to define the occurring problems, design a plan on how to remediate it, implement the planned remedial activities, and revise methods based on the recognized learning outcome.


Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento